<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 College Scandals of All Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinecolleges.net/2009/08/26/top-10-college-scandals-of-all-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinecolleges.net/2009/08/26/top-10-college-scandals-of-all-time/</link>
	<description>Explore our guides to the top online schools and learn about how online education can help you meet your academic, professional, and personal goals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chavez</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinecolleges.net/2009/08/26/top-10-college-scandals-of-all-time/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Chavez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinecolleges.net/?p=320#comment-457</guid>
		<description>One part of the Duke scandal which should not be overlooked was the reaction of the school admin. and the faculty. 

Duke&#039;s response seems to have been governed solely by PR considerations. Hence the accused were not offered one word of support by the Admin.; the university president refused to meet with them or their parents although he met with demonstrators and fervently addressed local community groups;  he refused to look at evidence proving them innocent; he denigrated them publicly; and  aside from one  exception, the faculty and students of the law school remained mum (while &quot;Scottsboro II&quot; was going on in their front yard).

OTOH, the faculty &quot;gang of 88&quot;, and others, did what they could to hound the accused off campus (while lumping all athletes in all sports into the same category). Never waste a crisis. It seems everyone had an agenda
and, &quot;sometimes a case is so important that innocence cannot be allowed as a defense.&quot;

The expected support from the &quot;alma mater&quot; was not forthcoming. The &quot;alma mater&quot; was not even neutral; it was leading the cheering section for the prosecution in hopes of diverting the lynch mob from its door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One part of the Duke scandal which should not be overlooked was the reaction of the school admin. and the faculty. </p>
<p>Duke&#8217;s response seems to have been governed solely by PR considerations. Hence the accused were not offered one word of support by the Admin.; the university president refused to meet with them or their parents although he met with demonstrators and fervently addressed local community groups;  he refused to look at evidence proving them innocent; he denigrated them publicly; and  aside from one  exception, the faculty and students of the law school remained mum (while &#8220;Scottsboro II&#8221; was going on in their front yard).</p>
<p>OTOH, the faculty &#8220;gang of 88&#8243;, and others, did what they could to hound the accused off campus (while lumping all athletes in all sports into the same category). Never waste a crisis. It seems everyone had an agenda<br />
and, &#8220;sometimes a case is so important that innocence cannot be allowed as a defense.&#8221;</p>
<p>The expected support from the &#8220;alma mater&#8221; was not forthcoming. The &#8220;alma mater&#8221; was not even neutral; it was leading the cheering section for the prosecution in hopes of diverting the lynch mob from its door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

